<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linux, Open Source and Web 2.0 &#187; OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itecsoftware.com/tag/os/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itecsoftware.com</link>
	<description>Itec Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>32-bit versus 64-bit, which one should I choose?</title>
		<link>http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose</link>
		<comments>http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.itecsoftware.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose" title="32-bit versus 64-bit, which one should I choose?"></a>A common question that pops up from time to time is whether someone who has a 64-bit CPU (such as an AMD64 or an Intel EM64T) should install a 64-bit or 32-bit version of the preferred OS. Since these processors &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose" title="32-bit versus 64-bit, which one should I choose?"></a><!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>A common question that pops up from time to time is whether someone who has a 64-bit CPU (such as an AMD64 or an Intel EM64T) should install a 64-bit or 32-bit version of the preferred OS. Since these processors are capable of running either one at full native speeds, what are the advantages and disadvantages to both? 64-bit just sounds cool and faster, but we all heard about headaches installing the OS, drivers and software. Are they still valid or a thing of the past?</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span></p>
<p><strong>Compatibility</strong> &#8211; Not all software runs on 64-bit Linux. Although there have been 64-bit native Linux distributions for several years, the software community has yet to fully embrace the technology. Not all hardware has 64-bit drivers yet. The two major display card manufacturers (ATI and Nvidia) do have X86_64 versions of their drivers, but they are sadly the exception rather than the norm.</p>
<p><strong>Speed</strong> &#8211; Without a scientific set of benchmarks this one is really hard to measure. Some people think one distribution &#8220;feels&#8221; faster than another while others disagree. Suffice to say that no one has yet to prove scientifically that the 64-bit versions of Linux available today are significantly faster in performance than their 32-bit counterparts. Most 64-bit versions of software are actually just recompiled versions of the 32-bit code, with no optimisation that would take advantage of the new features these chips offer and perhaps boost performance. If you&#8217;re looking to use 64-bit because you think it will be a major improvement in speed, I would reconsider.</p>
<p><strong>RAM</strong> &#8211; If you plan on using a machine that has more than 4GB of RAM, you&#8217;ll need to use the 64-bit version of your distribution because 32-bit operating systems are only able to handle up to 4GB, maximum. There&#8217;s just not enough memory addresses for more. With RAM becoming less expensive by the day, the 4GB limit is not really applicable for most users any more.</p>
<p><strong>Being &#8220;Cool&#8221;</strong> &#8211; As Apple Computer has proven in recent years, there&#8217;s an awful lot people will do just because something looks or feels &#8220;cool&#8221;. This is perhaps the one reason why some people choose to run 64-bit Linux: it&#8217;s a neat idea. To some people the idea of running a 64-bit native operating system on their 64-bit CPU is just too cool to pass up. These people understand the drawbacks to running a bleeding-edge system and accept the extra work involved. If this describes you, more power to you.</p>
<p><strong>Which one is it?</strong> If you&#8217;re a geek or at least have an in depth knowledge about compiling and installing software, have no issue editing configuration files and/or need more than 4GB of RAM, go for it. For the rest of us, it&#8217;s just fun to download the latest offerings from you preferred distro, install it and give it a test ride. With every release, there are more software included, 64-bit drivers that work and an OS that&#8217;s more stable and faster than its predecessor. You might just like it and decide to keep it.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itecsoftware.com/32-bit-versus-64-bit-which-one-should-i-choose/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/13 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 395/406 objects using memcached

Served from: www.itecsoftware.com @ 2012-02-06 12:36:08 -->
